
Drafting Damages and Penalty Clauses
Robert Fenwick Elliott, Barrister, Howard Zelling Chambers
The title of the talk is a bit of a misnomer, because nobody in their right mind would want to draft a penalty clause – it is of no legal effect. So I will talk about drafting liquidated damages clauses instead. And delay damages clauses as well. They are a bit of a misnomer too, at any rate in international terms. In FIDIC contracts (used all around the world) the expression “delay damages” means liquidated damages payable by a contractor to principal for inexusable delay. But here in Australia, the expression means the sums payable by a principal to a contractor for compensable delay. At bit like “thongs”, which in Australia are plastic sandals, but elsewhere are flimsy bits of ladies’ underwear. Anyway, I hope to sort it all out (not the thongs thing) on Thursday week.
For some reason which is a little obsure, there is something about this area of law – liquidated damages etc – which law students doing disertations find utterly compelling. There are probably as many on this topic as every other aspect of construction law put together. It is actually an interesting area of the law, with ingredients ranging from 19th century equity to modern consumer considerations. But the purpose of this talk is not so much to dwell on interesting and difficult questions of jurisprudential theory, but rather to steer practitioners around the several drafting traps which populate this neck of the legal woods.
