Some time ago, my old friend John Marrin (now a colleague at Keating Chambers) told me that he had cited my first book – Building Contract Litigation – to the Court of Appeal as the only authority on a particular point. The court apparently enquired as to whether I was dead. I am not sure why. It seems this is no longer a necessary criterion for authority.
No such problem in the UK Supreme Court decision this week in Bresco Electrical Services Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant) v Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Ltd (Respondent). In the course of its finding that adjudication is available to liquidators it noted, at paragraph 15of the judgment, that my book Building Contract Disputes: Practice and Precedents (now in the excellent care of my old friend and partner in Fenwick Elliott LLP, Jeremy Glover) is a “leading textbook”. Quite right.
The other leading textbook identified by the Supreme Court was Keating on Construction Contracts. That, of course, is also quite right.
Will the decision have implications for Australia? It might well. But it has to be noted that the respect that parties accord to Australian adjudication determinations is somewhat less than in the UK.
2 thoughts on “A Leading Question”
Good on you rob! I still await myself being cited. Even though I know everyone is using my paper on the enforcement of extended contractual warranties. Just don’t know if anyone openly acknowledges it!
2/174 Phillip Street
Sydney NSW 2000
DX 1231 Sydney
telephone +612 8023 9026
facsimile +612 9231 3320
mobile +61 409 500 685
Member of Melbourne TEC Chambers
1. This e-mail contains confidential information intended only for the above named person. The information this e-mail contains may be the subject of a claim to legal professional privilege. If this e-mail is received by you by mistake, you are asked to telephone +612 8815 9211. You may be asked to return this e-mail to me.
2. I do not represent that this communication (including any files attached) is free from computer viruses or other faults or defects. I will not be liable to you or to any other person for any loss or damage (including direct, consequential or economic loss or damage) however caused and whether by negligence or otherwise which may result directly or indirectly from the receipt or use of this communication or any files attached to this communication. It is the responsibility of any person opening any files attached to this communication to scan those files for computer viruses.
3. Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.
So very glad that you have recovered Robert and are once again, penning some thought provoking text! You will be glad to hear that I have given my partner Steve the task of unscrambling Tamaki, whilst I endeavour to make sense of an equally confounding set of circumstances . Good to have you back !
Sent from my iPhone