Keeping Busy

Those who visit these pages from time to time might have noticed that it has been a little while since my last post, and perhaps guess that this is a symptom of idleness.

In fact, the contrary is true. Since getting back from Europe and the United States, I have had far too little time for sidelines. In moving to the beautiful Myponga Beach, I had in mind that these days I go to the airport rather more often than I go to the law courts in Adelaide, and so it is been continuing to prove: I have been in Sydney on dispute avoidance board business and in Darwin on adjudication determination challenge business.

I did rather think that I might have been able to set a bit of precedent in the Northern Territory courts, in terms of bringing the Northern Territory into line with the rest of the country, and in particular New South Wales, on the topic of what introductory relief should be granted after an adjudication challenge has been launched, but before it can be heard by the court. In the Northern Territory, the typical Continue reading →

Understanding Construction Law

RJFE coggins evans

With Jeremy Coggins (centre) and Phil Evans (right)

I was pleased the other day to be at the book launch of Understanding Construction Law, by inter alia Dr Jeremy Coggins and Professor Phil Evans.

With the benefit of only a brief look, it looks very good; I will look forward to spending some more time with it in due course.

My own progress with Extra-Contractual Recoveries has been Continue reading →

There Is Always One

IndemnitiesI was asked to give a paper in Adelaide last week on the topic of “Drafting Indemnities: Getting the Details Right”. It was part of a marathon one day session where Legalwise Seminars enabled practitioners to collect 10 CPD points in a single day. It is a pretty fair guess that the delegates (there were quite a number of them) were there because they needed the CPD points, and not so much because they were lying awake at night worrying about how to draft their indemnities.

I have had bigger challenges. It’s not long ago that I was asked to give an after dinner speech on the subject of insolvency in the construction industry. It was a topic of interest because there has been quite a lot of insolvency in the construction industry around here recently. The challenge was that I was told to try to make it funny!

Anyway, I did my best to make this rather dry topic of drafting indenity clauses as interesting as I could, and as far as I could tell, no one actually fell asleep.

After these events, the conference organisers, Legalwise Seminars, collate and send round the evaluation forms that the delegates are asked to fill in, so that speakers can get some feedback on how the session was received. I thought Continue reading →

Pay now, Argue Later

buy now pay laterI coined the expression “Pay now, argue later” to describe the adjudication process in early 1996 during discussions with Lord Howie of Troon in the tea room at the House of Lords. Lord Howie was a Scottish engineer, picking up the recommendation in Sir Michael Latham’s Report to introduce an adjudication scheme into construction contracts, and very sensibly sought the input of TeCSA as to how this might best be done. I was advising him to stay clear of his initial idea of making the adjudicator’s decision final and binding, on the basis that if it was final and binding, it would be impossible to prevent the courts from placing all sorts of obstacles in the way of enforcement.  It was a play on the old hire purchase slogan: “Buy now, pay later”.  I said that if an adjudication loser was obliged to pay up, without prejudice to its right to then fight it out in the courts or arbitration to try to get it back, that would achieve the objective we were looking for, but minimising the risk of court interference. It would be rare, I predicted, that this right to “argue later” would be used very much in practice.  Happily, Continue reading →

BOSSing Around

BOSSI will be at the BOSS dinner at the Wine Centre in Adelaide on Friday, having been asked to give an after dinner speech on the topic of construction insolvency.

BOSS is the Builders’ Organisation for Students and Staff, and the thing is organised by the School of Natural and Built Environment at the University of South Australia.

They want me to Continue reading →

Back home

debateJust back from the Society of Construction Law’s 2015 Conference in Melbourne. Brilliant.

There were some excellent papers. Everyone will have learned some really useful stuff; I certainly did.  But we also had some good fun.

Yesterday evening, I participated in the dinner debate at the Fox Car Museum. Who is more useful, lawyers or experts? Never have I been involved in such a rigged Continue reading →

The Young

CareersThis is a bit scary. I have been asked to be part of a panel: we are supposed to talk about our careers in the construction industry.

Not being able to imagine that Young Constructors would have any interest at all in my career, I agreed on the basis that I would tell some war stories about stuff that I have seen. But do I tell stories about when I was young? That might sound like an old soldier talking about battles from a long-forgotten era. Or more recent stories? What relevance would the observations of an old soldier have to the young?

Or should I talk about Continue reading →

Welsh Rare Bit of Fun

cardiff_crownIt is rare for court transcripts to be all that amusing, but this one, from a court in Wales, is.259519829-The-Harry-Potter-case (2)

The advocate for the defendant was a solicitor called Alan Blacker, who practices under the name Lord Harley. It appears that he subsequently made a complaint against the judge!

It would be fun if there was more of this sort of thing. But unhappily, real cases involve real people, who can get really badly Continue reading →